Main strength
Match data alongside a model-based forecast.
Main limitation
FAQ and completed-match behaviour differ; original publication times and long-term retention are unverified.
What we checked: a concrete example
Leeds vs Tottenham — completed match view
Checked 7 November 2026 · Public pages and retrieved source snapshots · Check protocol
| Find a match | Observed The homepage match list opens a Leeds–Tottenham event page. Its data appeared after the initial page text loaded. Inspect primary page |
|---|---|
| Inspect the analysis | Observed The event view contains winner, goals, score and BTTS fields alongside team and head-to-head statistics. Inspect primary page |
| Find earlier material | Mixed evidence The FAQ says forecasts are for future games only, yet the inspected completed event still displays prediction fields. Inspect primary page |
| Inspect results reporting | Observed, limited The event shows FT 1–0 while retaining Tottenham, under 2.5 and 0–1 prediction fields. Long-term retention and original timestamps remain unverified. Inspect primary page |
Our assessment: Useful match-level context, with partial post-match forecast visibility; archive completeness remains an open question.
What is free and what type of service is it?
The site offers public football statistics and forecasts. Its FAQ describes free access and explains that SoccerVista is an information service rather than a bookmaker. [1] [2] A reader does not need to treat a bookmaker promotion on a page as part of the forecast itself.
The model and the confidence scale
The FAQ attributes its confidence indicator to a prediction model and explains a scale from one to ten. [2] That is an internal indicator, not a verified percentage chance or an independently measured success rate. Without a public calibration study, converting such a score into an exact probability would create precision the evidence does not support.
What the completed-match check changed
The FAQ says forecasts are shown for future games only. [2] However, our 7 November check found a completed Leeds–Tottenham page displaying both FT 1–0 and prediction fields. [3] The earlier categorical claim that no past forecasts could be inspected was too strong. The results-transparency score is now 2/5 for limited observed visibility. We have not established the original publication time, unchanged forecasts or long-term archive completeness.
What the checked example reveals
The live event contradicts a categorical reading of the FAQ: at least one completed match still exposes forecasts. We have therefore withdrawn the earlier claim that no past forecasts are available and replaced the results score of 0/5 with limited credit of 2/5. The page does not establish when those fields were first published or whether an entire historical series remains available. See the dated four-task check and primary pages.
Presentation and unresolved questions
The match list can populate after the initial page text. The completed-match view separates event action, forecast fields and historical team statistics. Finding those fields establishes their visibility in the sample, rather than an immutable forecast record.
Who it fits and alternatives
SoccerVista fits readers combining fixture statistics with numerical forecasts. For a clearly labelled previous-day forecast listing, compare Forebet and WinDrawWin. For domestic league statistics, compare FootyStats. Different reporting formats should be assessed on the evidence each exposes.
Editorial rating breakdown
Assessment dated 7 November 2026 · Based on the dated primary-source sample below.
| Verifiable results (30%) | 2/5 The 7 November completed Leeds–Tottenham view retains forecast fields beside FT 1–0, despite the FAQ describing future games only. This supports partial post-match visibility, not a complete timestamped archive. [2] [3] |
|---|---|
| Analysis and methodology (25%) | 2/5 The FAQ explains the model confidence scale and public match data adds context. The full calculation and probability calibration are not provided in the inspected explanation. [1] [2] |
| Free content (15%) | 4/5 Public statistics and forecasts are available; the FAQ states the service is free. [1] [2] |
| Coverage (10%) | 3/5 Football fixture statistics and 1X2/goals information are confirmed. Complete domestic coverage across the focus countries remains unverified. [1] |
| User experience (10%) | 2.5/5 · Estimated A comparable small-screen and keyboard-navigation assessment is still needed. No measured loading-speed or local-network test was performed. Neutral midpoint assumption; not a verified assessment of this feature. |
| Local relevance (10%) | 2.5/5 · Estimated A country-scoped assessment of domestic coverage, useful local context and access is incomplete. Country names or worldwide availability alone do not establish this criterion. Neutral midpoint assumption; not a verified assessment of this feature. |
Sensitivity to missing evidence: holding the assessed scores fixed, the total could range from 4.0 to 6.0/10 if the unverified criteria were all 0 or all 5. This is an assumption range, not a statistical confidence interval.
These are provisional editorial judgments about service features, not measured prediction accuracy or a betting-return forecast. How estimates and ranking work.
Sources and review date
Background primary sources were initially checked on 5 November 2026. The four-task check above records the newer 7 November 2026 observations and retrieval limits. Added sources explicitly identify their later check date. Dynamic content may change; this is not a paid-account or prediction-performance audit.
- Public football informationInitial check 5 November 2026
- SoccerVista FAQ: model, free access and previous predictionsInitial check 5 November 2026
- Completed Leeds–Tottenham match view, checked 7 NovemberChecked 7 November 2026